Skip to main content
Table of Contents
Who Pays the Legal Costs in a Family Provision Claim in Sydney?
The Discretionary Power of the Court
When the Claimant is Successful
When the Claimant is Unsuccessful
Addressing Financial Risk: Our Full No Win, No Fee Service
The Role of Mediation and Settlement
The NSW Supreme Court's Focus on Proportionality
Get Specialist Advice Before You Act
Frequently Asked Questions

Who Pays the Legal Costs in a Family Provision Claim in Sydney?

The question of legal costs is often the first thing people ask when considering a Family Provision Claim against an estate in Sydney. It’s a critical concern, as litigation can be expensive.

While the general rule in most civil litigation is that "costs follow the event" (the loser pays the winner's costs), Family Provision Claims in the Supreme Court of NSW operate under a different, more flexible framework. The Court has a wide discretion under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) to make orders that it thinks are just and fair.

The Discretionary Power of the Court

In a Family Provision Claim, the Court's primary focus is on whether the deceased person failed to make adequate provision for the proper maintenance, education, or advancement in life of an eligible claimant. The issue of costs is considered separately and is ultimately decided on a case-by-case basis.

Section 99 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) gives the Court the power to order that the costs of the proceedings be paid out of the estate or the notional estate, in a manner the Court thinks fit. This power allows the Court to depart from the usual rule of "loser pays."

When the Claimant is Successful

If the Court finds that the claimant was not adequately provided for and makes a Family Provision Order in their favour, the general trend is that the claimant's reasonable legal costs will be paid out of the estate.

The Rationale

The reasoning is straightforward: if the Court has to correct an injustice caused by the deceased's will, the successful claimant should not have their rightful provision diminished by having to pay their own legal costs. In these scenarios:

  • Claimant's Costs: Usually paid from the estate.
  • Executor's Costs: The executor, in defending the estate, is typically entitled to have their costs (usually on an indemnity basis, which covers a larger portion of the costs incurred) paid from the estate as well, provided they acted reasonably and prudently.

The provision awarded to the claimant, and the legal costs for all parties, will then reduce the amount available for the other beneficiaries named in the Will.

When the Claimant is Unsuccessful

This is where the financial risk is highest for a claimant.

The General Principle

If the claim is unsuccessful, the claimant will almost certainly have to pay their own legal costs. Furthermore, the Court may order the claimant to pay the estate’s legal costs (or a portion of them).

Departure from the Rule: No Order as to Costs

However, in Family Provision Claims, judges often recognise that claimants are often financially vulnerable. Therefore, it is not uncommon for an unsuccessful claimant to receive no adverse costs order against them, meaning they only have to pay their own legal costs. The estate, in this scenario, still bears the cost of its own defence.

The High-Risk Scenario: Adverse Costs Order

The Court is more likely to order an unsuccessful claimant to pay the estate’s costs if the claim was deemed to be:

  • Unreasonable Rejection of a Settlement Offer: The claimant unreasonably rejected a genuine, reasonable, and commercially sensible settlement offer made by the estate (such as an offer made pursuant to Reg 20.26 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) or accordance with the principles set out in Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333).
  • Frivolous or Vexatious: The claimant had little or no reasonable prospects of success or was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose.
  • Ineligible to Contest: The claimant is not eligible to contest the Will as defined in section 57 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).

Addressing Financial Risk: Our Full No Win, No Fee Service

A significant concern for potential claimants is the need to fund a complex legal case upfront. To make justice accessible, we offer a powerful Conditional Costs Agreement, known as our Full No Win, No Fee arrangement, for eligible Family Provision Claims.

How Our Full "No Win, No Fee" Works

Our unique arrangement is designed to minimise your financial exposure:

  • Professional Fees: You will not be charged for our professional legal services (time, advice, negotiation, and court preparation) unless your case is successfully resolved (you receive a settlement or a court order).
  • Disbursements Funded: We pay all necessary disbursements (out-of-pocket expenses such as court filing fees, expert report costs, and search fees) as the case progresses.
  • Leading Barristers: We partner with leading barristers who also agree to act on a conditional basis, meaning their substantial fees are also not payable unless your case is successful.
  • If We Lose: If your claim is unsuccessful, you pay nothing for our professional fees or the disbursements we have funded. You would only be responsible for any adverse costs order made by the Court (e.g., being ordered to pay the estate’s legal fees, which is rare for genuinely needy claimants).

The Role of Mediation and Settlement

The vast majority of Family Provision Claims in Sydney settle out of court at mediation. This is always the preferred outcome, as it reduces legal fees and offers certainty for all parties.

In a negotiated settlement, the matter of legal costs is an integral part of the agreement. Typically:

  • The claimant receives a lump sum settlement amount inclusive of their costs. They then pay their lawyer from that lump sum.
  • The executor’s costs are paid from the estate.

The key advantage of settling is that the parties maintain control over the cost outcome, rather than leaving the decision to the discretion of a judge.

The NSW Supreme Court's Focus on Proportionality

A major trend in the NSW Supreme Court is the increasing emphasis on proportionality and costs capping. Judges are becoming more scrutinising of legal fees, especially in smaller estates.

The court aims to ensure that the legal costs incurred do not consume an unreasonable proportion of the estate’s value. If the costs are disproportionate to the amount in dispute, the Court may intervene to limit the amount of costs a party can recover, even if they are successful.

Get Specialist Advice Before You Act

The rules surrounding legal costs in Family Provision Claims are complex, and the outcome always depends on the unique facts of the case. Never assume your costs will be paid by the estate.

Before taking any action, it is essential to get specialist legal advice to:

  • Assess the Merits of Your Claim: A strong claim with a high likelihood of success is essential for proceeding.
  • Understand the Risks: Be fully informed of the worst-case scenario for adverse costs.
  • Discuss Funding Options: Clearly understand the terms and benefits of our Full No Win, No Fee arrangement.

Are you an eligible person who feels they has been left without adequate provision from an estate? Contact us today for a confidential assessment of your Family Provision Claim and a clear understanding of the potential costs and funding options involved.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between my legal "costs" and my "provision" (the money I get)?
Your provision is the amount the Court or the parties agree you are entitled to receive from the estate for your proper maintenance and advancement. Your legal costs are the fees charged by your lawyer and barristers for handling the case. In a successful claim, the Court generally orders that your reasonable legal costs be paid out of the estate, meaning they are typically paid before the remaining provision is distributed.
Does your Full "No Win, No Fee" service cover all costs if I lose?
Our Full No Win, No Fee agreement means that if your case loses, you pay nothing for our professional legal fees or the disbursements (out-of-pocket expenses) we have funded. The only remaining risk is the rare possibility of the Court ordering you to pay the estate's legal costs (an adverse costs order), which is less likely for genuine Family Provision Claimants.
If I win, does the estate pay 100% of my legal fees?
Not always 100%. The Court typically orders the estate to pay the successful claimant’s costs on an ordinary basis, which covers a significant portion (often 60–75%) of the actual fees incurred. Under our Full No Win, No Fee agreement, our professional fees, disbursements, and an agreed-upon uplift fee are recovered from the provision you receive.
How does your No Win, No Fee service apply to barrister fees?
We often work with leading barristers who share our confidence in the case. Where possible, we engage them on a conditional basis, meaning their fees are only payable if your case is successful. This provides you with access to top-tier advocacy without the burden of upfront fees.
Can the estate challenge or dispute my legal fees?
Yes. If the Court orders the estate to pay your costs, the executor has the right to request a formal assessment or taxation of your legal bill by an independent costs assessor. This ensures that the costs claimed are reasonable and proportionate to the work done and the size of the estate. The Supreme Court of NSW is strict about ensuring costs are proportionate.
Does my eligibility for a Family Provision Claim affect my eligibility for your No Win, No Fee service?
Yes. We can only offer our Full No Win, No Fee arrangement to claimants whose cases we assess as having a high likelihood of success. This allows us to take on all the financial risk. The first step is always a thorough, confidential assessment of your claim's merits.
What if the estate is small? Will the Court still order costs to be paid?
In small estates, the Court is particularly sensitive to the issue of proportionality. The judge will strive to avoid a scenario where legal costs consume a major portion of the estate, leaving little for the beneficiaries or the claimant. In such cases, the Court may cap the amount of costs paid from the estate or encourage aggressive mediation to minimise fees.
If the case settles at mediation, who decides on the costs?
When a case settles at mediation, the costs are part of the overall negotiation and agreement. The settlement sum will specify the provision amount and often a separate contribution towards the claimant's legal costs. The parties, not the Court, agree on the costs, providing greater certainty and control over the final outcome.

Do you have any other questions?

A portrait of PBRitz founder, Phillip Briffa

About our Director, Phillip Briffa

I founded PB Ritz in 2013 with a single objective in mind – to be the go-to law firm in NSW for all things Wills & Estates law.

Fast forward all these years and I am proud to say we have grown to become one of NSW’s leading law firms in this niche area.

Whether you need assistance with obtaining probate and distributing a loved one’s estate, are interested to get your estate planning affairs in order, or require assistance with contesting or challenging a Will – we have the experience and the knowhow to assist.

Contact me now to discuss how we can help you.